Advised on the following matters by the Commission:
Kickin' It Karlsruhe Style 🎶
Hey there! Ever wondered what an ad should look like when a company slaps on a sweet discount? That's the burning question currently grilling the highest German civil court, none other than the fabulous Federal Court of Justice in Karlsruhe. Recently, they had a powwow about this very topic, hearing a complaint by the cool Competition Center against the thrifty discounter, Netto. But will they drop the verdict any time soon? Only time will tell.
The Competition Center is chilling hard, claimin' a violation of the Price Indication Ordinance in a coffee ad by the discounter. Basically, traders hankerin' to flaunt some discounts gotta include the cheapest price that a product's been goin' for in the last 30 days. The way this 'reference price' should be highlighted has been a hot debate for a while. Folks been wonderin', does a footnote suffice?
Footnotes: Not Just for Scholarly Papers
Netto thought footnotes were all a discounter needed when they slapped their coffee deal in a brochure. They said the java was now selling for 4.44 euros, markin' a 36 percent reduction from the week before (6.99 euros). But in a footnote, consumers could find that the product had actually been priced at 4.44 euros in the last 30 days.
Bad news for Netto, bro! Both lower courts have backed the Competition Center. Plus, in September, the suave European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg ruled that ads like Netto's needed to highlight the lowest price from the last 30 days. The percent discount info gotta be based on that, too. Do the math, and it looks like Netto's ad might need to retire early.
Competition Center's Dancin' in the Endzone
"I predict the Federal Court of Justice is gonna give the ol' thumbs down to this ad, just like the lower courts," said Reiner Münker, the swank Managing Director of the Competition Center, after the recent hearing. Does the advertisement violate the ECJ decision? Yep, 'cause the percent reduction didn't line up with the reference price. And the way Netto presented those prices? Too tricky and hard to understand for regular consumers.
Now let's talk 'bout another player in the discount game named Netto. They're more of a chill vibe, usually hangin' out in the north and east of Germany, and they got a doggy in their logo. But don't worry, the complaints lodged against that new-age Netto at the BGH are aimed at the bigger chain, Netto Marken-Discount, based in Maxhütte-Haidhof, Bavaria.
Don't miss a beat! Stay tuned for more deets on this delightful dance between retailers and regulators right here. 💥💥💥 #NettoAdTakedown #KarlsruheRuling #GermanyLaw #DiscountWarriors #competitioncenter #PricesLaw #AdvertisingLaw
Enrichment Data:There's some background information to share about this legal skirmish, but I'll keep it light and fun to keep things interesting.
It all started in 2020 when Netto made a splash with an ad for a coffee product. The ad in question was later deemed by the Karlsruhe court to violate the Price Indication Ordinance. The ruling was based on confusion over the presentation of prices in the ad, which led consumers to misunderstand the actual cost of the product.
The price ads controversy is hardly a new development, with similar incidents unfolding in the past. For instance, about a decade ago, another discount chain called Penny was found guilty of misleading consumers with price ads.
The Competition Center is celebrating a potential victory in the realm of business and finance, as they expect the Federal Court of Justice to rule against Netto's misleading coffee ad. This dispute, rooted in the Price Indication Ordinance, revolves around the clarity of price presentation in advertisements, impacting both small and larger businesses in Germany.
Netto's financial future may be at stake, as their advertisement has been criticized for violating the European Court of Justice's decision on price presentation. If the verdict follows the lower courts' rulings, Netto's ad may no longer be valid, marking a significant shift in the competitive business landscape.
