Skip to content

Application Status Unknown for Commission: Scheme Remains Unsubstantiated

Time Limit Removal Approved by BGH

Uncooperative Patrons Should Not Aid Financial Institutions Easily
Uncooperative Patrons Should Not Aid Financial Institutions Easily

Bank Fee Refunds: How Long Can You Claim Back Unlawful Fees?

Application Status Unknown for Commission: Scheme Remains Unsubstantiated

In a recent decision, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) clarified the timeframe for claiming back unlawfully charged account fees by banks and savings banks. According to the court, the standard statute of limitations of three years applies from the end of the year in which the claim arose, regardless of when consumers learned about the invalidity of the corresponding clauses.

Previously, many consumers had successfully reclaimed money following a BGH ruling four years ago. However, it was uncertain when these claims for repayment would expire. Consumer groups argued that the statute of limitations should only begin when consumers discovered the invalidity of the clauses, with the latest being the 2021 BGH ruling.

The BGH, however, has a different stance. The court stated that consumers could have filed a lawsuit even before the 2021 BGH ruling, as there was no ambiguity concerning the effectiveness of these clauses. What matters is when the claims arose.

The ruling was based on a model declaratory action brought by the Federation of German Consumer Organisations against the Berlin Sparkasse. The Berlin Sparkasse's General Terms and Conditions contained a "consent fiction clause," which assumed that customers consented to changes in account fees if they failed to object within a certain period. This practice was common among many banks and savings banks. The BGH had previously rejected this practice in April 2021.

In the judges' opinion, changes in a bank's general terms and conditions (GTC) that only become effective due to implied consent are invalid.

  • Key Phrases: Federal Court of Justice, Unlawful Bank Fees, Statute of Limitations, Sparkasse, Consent Fiction Clause
  • Applicable Law: German Civil Law (BGB), § 195 BGB (Statute of Limitations)
  • Related Entities: Banks, Savings Banks, Consumer Associations, Consumer Protection, Legal Questions
  • Source: ntv.de, awi/dpa
  • Additional Insight: The specific statute of limitations for unlawful bank fees in Germany varies based on the violation and can be as short as one year for consumer protection issues and up to three years for contractual disputes. To ensure success in claiming back unlawful fees, it is advisable to consult with a German law expert or legal precedents for guidance.

Community policy, as outlined by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), determines that consumers can file lawsuits against banks for unlawfully charged fees, even before a recent BGH ruling. In the context of business operations, understanding this community policy could be crucial for vocational training programs in legal studies or banking sectors, as it addresses financial implications and consumer protections.

Read also:

    Latest