Skip to content

Canada's Buy Now, Pay Later service faces scrutiny as usage swells, unearthing its hidden pitfalls

Soaring demand for "Buy Now, Pay Later" services from fintech companies like Affirm and PayBright sees consumers taking advantage of extended payment options without the usual credit hassle. However, these easy payment plans may come with hidden costs, hinting at a potential drawback to this...

Rise in popularity of 'Buy Now, Pay Later' option across Canada uncovers its hidden pitfalls
Rise in popularity of 'Buy Now, Pay Later' option across Canada uncovers its hidden pitfalls

Canada's Buy Now, Pay Later service faces scrutiny as usage swells, unearthing its hidden pitfalls

The Buy Now, Pay Later (BPNL) phenomenon is gaining traction among fintech firms in North America, with Canada being no exception. According to a report by ResearchAndMarkets.com, the growth of BPNL in Canada is significant, reaching an anticipated US$8 billion by the end of this year, marking a more than 10% annual increase.

BPNL services, which allow consumers to purchase goods and services and pay for them in installments, are currently in a regulatory grey zone, neither considered a credit card nor a traditional loan. This ambiguous status has raised concerns about its potential impact on consumer debt, particularly in light of Canadians' record high consumer debt of $2.5T as of 2024, according to a recent TransUnion report.

Most BPNL 'debt' is not counted by traditional debt trackers, according to reports. This lack of transparency has led to concerns that BPNL could mask financial fragility, a concern echoed by Vass Bednar, a financial analyst who has been closely following the BPNL trend. Bednar warns that BPNL can potentially exacerbate existing financial issues by encouraging unnecessary spending and creating a cycle of debt.

However, Bednar also believes that there is a need for alternative repayment structures, and that it's not too late to take the beneficial aspects of BPNL (design, flexibility, immediacy) without the predatory risk model. He advocates for stricter regulatory oversight and increased transparency to ensure that BPNL services are used responsibly and do not contribute to the growing consumer debt problem in Canada.

The Canadian government agency that views BPNL services as a harmless innovation has not been specified. However, Bednar suggests that stronger consumer protection measures are necessary to prevent the adoption of predatory risk models. He warns against importing such models, which could potentially undermine the benefits of BPNL and lead to unintended consequences for consumers.

BPNL services have expanded to cover everyday expenses such as groceries and takeout, making them increasingly accessible to a wider audience. The rapid rise in popularity of BPNL could have a dark side, as its regulatory status and potential impact on consumer debt are still unclear.

As BPNL continues to grow in popularity, it is crucial that appropriate regulatory measures are put in place to protect consumers from potential financial harm. Bednar's reports for The Walrus suggest that the problem with BPNL in Canada could be bigger than anticipated, and it is essential that steps are taken to ensure that the benefits of BPNL are realised without the risks.

Read also:

Latest