Currency Stability vs. Adjustability: Weighing Pros, Cons, and Influences (Factors, Effects, Advantages, Disadvantages)

Currency Stability vs. Adjustability: Weighing Pros, Cons, and Influences (Factors, Effects, Advantages, Disadvantages)

A fixed exchange rate system, in which a country links its currency to another or a basket, provides numerous benefits and drawbacks, each impacting economic health and policy flexibility significantly.

Advantages of a Fixed Exchange Rate System

1. Economic Stability and Predictability: Fixed rates offer stability, easing international trade by helping businesses plan cross-border transactions and investors appraise risks. Stability may stem from increased investor confidence, as they perceive reduced risk in their long-term investments.
2. Lower Inflation: Countries with high inflation can adopt a fixed exchange rate to import the stability of the anchor currency's monetary policy, thus reducing domestic inflation rates.
3. Reduced Currency Volatility: Fixed rates eliminate the risk of sudden currency fluctuations, particularly advantageous for small, trade-dependent economies.
4. Economic Integration: Fixed rates can facilitate integration into larger currency blocs, such as participants preparing for eurozone membership or Gulf states aligning with the US dollar for oil trade.

Disadvantages of a Fixed Exchange Rate System

1. Loss of Monetary Policy Independence: Central banks lose the ability to use interest rates and money supply as economic management tools. Lowering interest rates for stimulus may lead to capital outflows, forcing a reversal in policy to protect the peg.
2. Vulnerability to Speculative Attacks: If investors question a country's ability to maintain the peg, they might stage a speculative attack, draining foreign reserves or resulting in devaluation (as seen in 1994, 1997, and 1997 crises in Mexico, Asia, and Russia).
3. Rigidity in Adjusting to Shocks: Fixed rates can impede countries' ability to adapt to external economic shocks like sudden changes in commodity prices or global demand, potentially exacerbating economic downturns.
4. Dependency on Anchor Currency Policies: The local economy becomes reliant on the anchor currency's monetary policy. This can create conflicts if domestic priorities (like employment or social spending) clash with the need to maintain the peg.
5. Potential for Hidden Economic Weaknesses: Fixed rates can obscure underlying economic problems, leading to sudden crises if the peg becomes unsustainable (like Argentina's 2001 default).

In summary, a fixed exchange rate system can bring stability and attract investment but also curtails economic policy flexibility and raises vulnerability to external shocks and speculative crises. Selecting an exchange rate regime requires careful consideration of the balance between stability and flexibility (1, 2).

Relevant Enrichment Data:

• A currency board system, another form of fixed exchange rate, imposes stricter rules for issuing domestic currency, linking its value one-to-one with a reserve currency (3).
• Managed floating exchange rates offer flexibility to adapt to economic shocks while maintaining some degree of control (4).
• Real exchange rates consider the buying power of a currency, indicating the impact of trade and inflation. Measuring exchange rates in this context helps analyze trade flows and their influence on competitiveness (5).
• Foreign exchange reserves serve as a nation's economic defense for protecting against disruptions or currency crises (6).
• Capital controls, while limiting inflow and outflow of funds, can help maintain exchange rate stability (7). The effectiveness of capital controls depends on their ability to hedge against destabilizing financial inflows and outflows (7).

Sources:[1] Goldstein, Maurice. The Quest for Greater Exchange Rate Flexibility. IMF. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wop/2004/01/index.htm

[2] Obstfeld, Maurice, and Kenneth Rogoff. "The International Monetary System." In First Edition of Economics, edited by VF Henderson, N Gregory Mankiw, and David Romer, 801-847. N.p., 2014.

[3] Favon, Pablo, and Julio D. Galup. "Fixed vs. Floating Exchange Rates." Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/fixed_vs_floating_exchange_rate.asp

[4] Taylor-Leech, David. "Exchange Rates and Economic Integration." Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. http://oxfordre.com/economicsandfinance/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.001.0001/acrefore-9780190625979-e-340

[5] Corden, W. Max. "Real Exchange Rates in open economies." The Economic Journal, vol. 82, no. 326, 1972, pp. 1109-1126.

[6] Khan, Muhammad A., et al. "Foreign Exchange Reserves." In Handbook on international economics, edited by Paelinck, J., and Montiel, C., vol. 3, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001, pp. 882-918.

[7] Camara, Velina. "Capital account controls and financial globalization." Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 37, no. 7, 2018, pp. 779-801.

1. Engaging in business activities or investments across borders can be facilitated through the stability offered by a fixed exchange rate system, as it helps enterprises predict the value of money in cross-border transactions.
2. However, maintaining a fixed exchange rate may restrict economic policy flexibility, potentially causing issues with currency volatility, adaptation to shocks, or dependence on the anchor currency's monetary policy, which could negatively impact the domestic business environment.

Read also: