"Extremely disappointing": Consumer Financial Protection Bureau dissolves expert witness agreements
It appears that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has unexpectedly halted ongoing cases against certain companies, which has left expert witnesses who were set to testify against these institutions caught off guard. One expert witness, who requested anonymity for fear of retribution, accused Elon Musk of intervening to shut down their case against a lender that was accused of exploiting working people.
The expert witnesses felt threatened, with one expressing concern over the possibility of being sued or even facing investigation from the FBI. Another expert witness, who had been working on a case against a debt buyer for several years, was shocked and frustrated by the sudden termination of their contract.
The CFPB did not respond to a request for comment on the situation.
When the CFPB decides to take legal action against a company, it often enlists the help of professors, researchers, and other experts to examine the evidence and provide testimony. This strategy allows the bureau to build a stronger case against the accused institution.
Kathleen Engel, a research professor at Suffolk University Law School, posited that the termination of expert witness contracts might indicate that the CFPB is no longer interested in pursuing claims against certain financial institutions. Engel, who served on an advisory board for the CFPB, suggested that this move is indicative of a broader policy under the current administration to pull back on enforcement actions.
The sudden cancellation of contracts with expert witnesses has raised eyebrows in the industry, leaving many wondering about the future of the CFPB and its ability to protect consumers from unfair financial practices.
Enrichment Data:
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has recently faced significant challenges due to the Trump administration's directives. On February 9, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget, headed by Russell Vought, ordered the CFPB to halt all work, including ongoing investigations, proposed rules, and rulemaking activities. This directive was part of a broader strategy to curtail the activities of several federal agencies deemed excessive by the Trump administration.
Furthermore, Rohit Chopra, the director of the CFPB, was fired by the Trump administration on February 9, 2025, despite his term not ending until 2026. These leadership changes, combined with the suspension of all CFPB operations, have left the agency's regulatory oversight and enforcement actions in limbo.
This directive has resulted in a significant blow to consumer protection, as the CFPB is no longer able to conduct exams, pursue existing investigations, or communicate with the companies it regulates or consumer advocates. This halt in operations could potentially lead to a decrease in enforcement actions against companies engaging in unfair practices, potentially harming consumers.
Additionally, the suspension of finalized but not yet effective rules may result in a regulatory freeze, which could undo recent protections implemented by the CFPB. However, this freeze is expected to be rolled back during the new administration, once it takes office.
In the meantime, Elon Musk's team has been granted access to federal payment systems and data, which has raised concerns about the misuse of sensitive information and potential conflicts of interest. Consumer advocates and lawmakers have criticized this move as an attempt to undermine the regulatory oversight of federal agencies, including the CFPB.
The situation underscores the broader tensions between the Trump administration's efforts to reduce government regulation and the need for robust consumer protection mechanisms. Over the past decade, the CFPB has been instrumental in holding financial institutions accountable and protecting consumers from exploitation. However, the sudden halt in its operations raises questions about the future of consumer protection under this administration.
The expert witnesses described feeling vulnerable, with one expressing apprehension about potential legal repercussions or FBI investigations. This uncertainty also affected another expert, who was involved in a multi-year case against a debt buyer and was taken aback by the sudden termination of their contract.
In light of the CFPB's recent halt on cases against certain companies, some experts believe that the bureau is less inclined to pursue claims against certain financial institutions. This perceived shift in policy, suggested by Kathleen Engel, a research professor at Suffolk University Law School, could potentially weaken the CFPB's ability to challenge unfair financial practices.
