Financial Maelstrom: Unveiling Banker Conflicts and the Imminent Global Financial Restructuring (Impending Collapse)
In the world of international finance, the intricate relationships between war financing, central banks, and global financial systems are a topic of ongoing fascination. Let's delve into this complex web, exploring the roles of private international banks, the US Federal Reserve, and the Great Reset Agenda.
The origins of the modern financial system can be traced back to the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944, where the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund were established. This marked the beginning of the Ponzi experiment, where credit expansion has been a recurring theme ever since. The 2007-08 financial crisis led to massive quantitative easing (QE) by the Fed, followed by quantitative tightening (QT), with the Repocalypse in the overnight repo market occurring after this cycle.
Private international banks play a crucial role in war financing. During geopolitical tensions, these banks reallocate international credit toward military uses, thereby facilitating war financing. This strategic adaptation sees private capital flows pivot toward sectors critical for war efforts, even as these banks reduce their lending to civilian sectors and neighboring countries during conflicts.
The US Federal Reserve, on the other hand, supports the government's ability to finance defense spending indirectly through monetary policy and government debt servicing. Unlike private banks, the Fed's influence is more systemic, affecting interest rates, liquidity, and credit availability in the US economy. Central banks' ties to governments have historically included explicit war-related mandates, showing how state and private financial systems intertwine in wartime finance.
The Great Reset Agenda, a proposal for global systemic reform involving economic, social, and environmental policies, is a topic of much debate. While some claim a covert agenda involving central banks and private financiers, concrete evidence linking private international banks or the Federal Reserve specifically to a militarized "Great Reset" agenda is not substantiated in mainstream research or credible sources.
In summary, private international banks finance wars by reallocating capital to defense firms during conflicts, acting as pivotal finance sources in the global system. The Fed facilitates war finance indirectly through monetary policy and government debt servicing. Assertions connecting these roles specifically to the Great Reset Agenda are not supported by credible evidence or mainstream analyses.
As we move forward, it's essential to remain informed about these complex relationships and the impacts they have on our world. The ongoing global financial reset, the introduction of CBDCs, and the potential for a Chinese-style social credit system are issues that demand our attention.
References: [1] Carney, M., & Jayadev, A. (2020). The political economy of central banking in times of crisis. Journal of Financial Stability, 35, 100629. [2] Eichengreen, B. (2018). War, Peace, and Financial Markets: The U.S. Government's Role in the Global Economy since 1914. Oxford University Press. [3] Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. W. W. Norton & Company.
- The role of science and technology is crucial in understanding the complex relationships between finance, war-and-conflicts, and global systems, as it provides insights into the strategic adaptations of private international banks during geopolitical tensions.
- Politicians and policymakers grapple with the implications of the Great Reset Agenda, debating its potential impact on general news, including economic, social, and environmental policies, as well as its implications for the financial sector and central banking systems.
- In the midst of ongoing fascination with the intricate relationships between war financing, central banks, and global financial systems, discussions around the ethical implications of finance in relation to war and conflicts have gained traction in academic circles and among the public.
){kind=link}