The European Commission's Legal Feud: Germany's Public Procurement Rules under Scrutiny
Germany faced legal action by the European Union over alleged breaches in public procurement regulations.
Share Tweet Text Mail Print Link
The European Commission has decisively taken Germany to the European Court of Justice, challenging its lax public procurement regulations that fail to meet EU standards. Despite a few improvements, the Brussels authority alleges that Germany has yet to fully implement essential European Union laws.
At the heart of the matter lies the murky definition of contracting authorities in German law, which the Commission claims hinders the selection of appropriate procurement procedures, due to its ambiguity. Moreover, in the postal sector, contracting authorities are exempt from adhering to public procurement regulations, raising additional concerns.
Having issued warnings in 2019 and a reasoned opinion in 2021, the Commission's patience has worn thin, leading to this litigious recourse. Despite some adjustments made by the federal government, three of the eight issues still remain unaddressed.
Competitive fairness in public tenders is, according to the Commission, pivotal for both bidding companies and procurement authorities. For businesses, it guarantees level ground, while for authorities, it facilitates the discovery of the most favorable offers.
[1] Source: ntv.de, dpa
On a broader scale, the European Commission's lawsuit serves as an expression of its continued commitment to maintain the integrity of EU public procurement law. This vigilance is essential for harmonizing procurement procedures across Member States, thereby protecting open, competitive, and transparent tendering within the EU single market.
Common shortcomings in the transposition of public procurement rules include the absence of measures advocating for transparency, fair competition, and non-discrimination. Additionally, insufficient mechanisms to police distortions in tender processes and inadequate procedures for vetting and evaluating tenders can give rise to corrupt practices.
[1] The Commission's referral stems from Germany's alleged failure to comply with the principles set out by the EU, leading to legal uncertainties or skewed competition in the tender process.
[5] Such infringements are not uncommon and involve aspects such as transparency, fair competition, and non-discrimination, as well as the prevention of distortions through rules concerning foreign subsidies and participation by non-EU entities. Lack of clear procedures for tendering notifications and evaluations also contribute to risks of arbitrariness or corruption.
- The European Commission's litigious recourse against Germany centres on the need for Germany to align its employment policies, particularly its public procurement regulations, with EU standards, as the current policies lack clarity and transparency.
- The Commission's ongoing dispute with Germany highlights the importance of employing sound policy practices in finance and business, to maintain the integrity of EU public procurement law, foster harmonious procurement procedures across Member States, and uphold the principles of open, competitive, and transparent tendering within the EU single market.
