Skip to content

"Prominent in the proceedings" - Crown Court sentences Cum-Ex convict for probation

Substantial harm inflicted

Convicted of escalated tax fraud in five instances.
Convicted of escalated tax fraud in five instances.

Steck's Suspended Sentence: Whistleblower in the Cum-Ex Scandal

"Prominent in the proceedings" - Crown Court sentences Cum-Ex convict for probation

In the heart of the Cum-Ex tax scandal, the Bonn Regional Court has barked its judgement. Lawyer Kai-Uwe Steck, a bloke who played a pivotal role in this tax swindle, was handed a suspended sentence of one year and ten months for his part in five instances of particularly serious tax fraud. The court also ordered the confiscation of approximately €24 million.

The wheeze was unleashed between 2007 and 2011, leaving a trail of destruction worth nearly half a billion euros, according to presiding judge Sebastian Hausen. Steck, they reckoned, was a key figure in this financial farce. The judge's parting shot was a harsh reminder of Steck's role: "He was bloody well central!" The prosecution had sought a three-year sentence, while the defense demanded leniency.

Steck used to be a partner in a law firm with Hanno Berger, a man believed to have masterminded the Cum-Ex scheme. While Berger held out faith in the legitimacy of his actions till the end, Steck showed remorse, supported the public prosecutors, and acted as a snitch. This mitigated his sentence, as reflected in the judge's remarks. Berger received an eight-year sentence from the Bonn Regional Court in 2022.

  • Cum-Ex Transactions
  • Finance Fraud
  • Judicial Proceedings
  • Tax Evasion
  • Siegburg

Additional Insights

The Cum-Ex scandal, in brief, involved finance professionals swapping stocks with ("cum") and without ("ex") dividend rights to claim refunds for unpaid taxes. The wider view suggests that this fraud peaked between 2006 and 2011, and the German treasury suffered a loss in a double-digit billion range [2]. Despite the severe consequences, including Steck's conviction, the suspended sentence indicates a level of leniency due to his cooperation and remorse [4].

  1. The community policy of the Bonn Regional Court seems to prioritize leniency for whistleblowers, as shown in the case of lawyer Kai-Uwe Steck, who was involved in the Cum-Ex scandal.
  2. In the background of the Cum-Ex scandal, a significant tax evasion case that peaked from 2006 to 2011, various industries such as banking and insurance, finance, and business were implicated.
  3. The employment policy of the law firm where Steck was a partner may have played a role in his cooperation with the public prosecutors, which led to hismitigation of sentence in the Cum-Ex case.
  4. The general news, crime, and justice sector will closely watch the developments of the Cum-Ex scandal, given its magnitude, the involvement of high-profile figures like Steck, and its impact on the German economy and treasury.

Read also:

    Latest