Unveiling Russia's Stance on Aviation Carbon Emissions: Skepticism and Self-Reliance
Proposal Made to Minimize Potential Cost Hikes for Aviation Fuel Labeled as "Eco-Friendly" by the Duma
Back in 2016, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) introduced the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), to which Russia, as a member, lends its membership. CORSIA aims to enhance fuel efficiency by 2% by 2050 and maintain carbon emissions at 2020 levels. The application of rules here is voluntary until 2027, but mandatory thereafter.
However, this global initiative doesn't sit well with Russia. According to ICAO resolution A41-22, airlines exceeding the baseline carbon emission level (85% of the 2019 level) will have to cough up the extra costs, creating financial troubles and reduced competitiveness for Russian airlines. Yuri Stankevich, a notable figure, argues that these additional expenses might be passed onto passengers in the form of higher ticket prices, potentially leading to a hike in air cargo prices, especially for time-sensitive items like pharmaceuticals and perishables. He advocates for the production of low-carbon aviation fuel in Russia, arguing that it's currently monopolized by unfriendly countries' companies[1][3].
Fast forward to 2022, Russia flags that it doesn't adhere to ICAO resolution A41-22 regarding emissions assessment for the CORSIA system. Russia's representatives at the organization dismiss compensation measures as futile in the face of unilateral sanctions against international civil aviation[2].
Russia's resistance to CORSIA can be attributed to reservations about the carbon credit market's supply constraints, uncertainties, and regulatory reliability under CORSIA's Phase 1. This phase has limited availability of eligible credits and fluctuating buyer confidence, leading airlines worldwide to buy smaller volumes of credits, testing the system's resilience[3][5].
To counter CORSIA's carbon credit offsetting system, Russia has focused on homegrown solutions, favoring:
- Tailored national or regional carbon pricing mechanisms for Russia's aviation and industrial sectors.
- Developing domestic carbon markets and environmental standards that align with Russia's economic interests.
- Emphasizing technology-driven emissions reductions through modernization of aircraft fleets, improvements in fuel efficiency, and the use of sustainable aviation fuels rather than offsetting emissions through external credits[1][2].
In international forums like ICAO and bilateral meetings, Russia advocates for more state-controlled climate action frameworks and criticizes the effectiveness and fairness of market-based mechanisms like CORSIA, which rely on international carbon credit trading[2].
In summary:
- Russia maintains a skeptical stance towards CORSIA's carbon credit offsetting system and exhibits limited participation in its market mechanisms.
- Challenges in carbon credit supply, market uncertainties, and regulatory reliability are reasons for such caution.
- Russia promotes alternative approaches such as strengthening domestic regulatory frameworks, technological innovation, and state-led climate strategies over relying on international offset markets.
This stance reflects the broader geopolitical context where Russia advocates for climate measures that respect national sovereignty and economic interests rather than broad multilateral market-based schemes[2][3][5].
Want more news? Join our Telegram channel @expert_mag
- In response to the CORSIA scheme's carbon credit offsetting system, Russia has shown interest in promoting environmental science, particularly focusing on the production of low-carbon aviation fuel and the modernization of aircraft fleets to enhance energy efficiency.
- Within the realm of finance, Russia questions the reliability and fairness of the carbon credit market under CORSIA, leading to a preference for tailored national or regional carbon pricing mechanisms that align with their economic interests.
- In the field of climate-change and industry, Russia prioritizes homegrown solutions, such as developing domestic carbon markets, improving fuel efficiency, and using sustainable aviation fuels, as opposed to relying on external carbon credits or international carbon trading.
