Steck's Cum-Ex Sentencing: When Will the Former Strategist Serve Time?
Steck's Cum-Ex Penalty: What Sentence Does the Cum-Ex Strategist Receive? - Sentence rephrased: What is the imposed penalty on the cum-ex strategist?
Prepare for the verdict in the most significant Cum-Ex trial in Germany! On Tuesday, the Siegburg court will issue a decision about key witness Kai-Uwe Steck, with potential implications for other witnesses. Steck is alleged to have caused a staggering 428 million euros in damages[1].
Cum-Ex involves illegal stock trades that manipulated the system, allowing investors to fraudulently reclaim taxes on multiple occasions. These transactions consisted of buying shares before the dividend record date and selling them afterward. This deceit allowed investors to claim a capital gains tax many times over, with banks and funds facilitating the process. Profits from these illicit transactions were then shared among participants[2].
The Elusive 50 Million Euros: Where's Steck's Stolen Fortune?
Together with his mentor and business partner, Hanno Berger (previously a tax official), Steck developed a profitable Cum-Ex business model in the 2000s. Sources claim Steck amassed a fortune of 50 million euros, yet there's no trace of it[1]. He had promised to pay his debt during Berger's trial, which took place at the end of 2022. However, while Berger served his time, the German state still waits for restitution[1].
According to the Bonn Regional Court, Steck has repaid 11 million euros, leaving a substantial 39 million euros unpaid[1]. Steck's credibility is in question due to his inability to fulfill this financial obligation. This uncertainty led to Anne Brorhilker filing aggravated tax evasion charges against Steck during her final months in office[1]. The trial has been ongoing since November 2024. The prosecution aims for a prison sentence of three years and eight months, the seizure of 26 million euros of Steck's assets, and a four-year professional ban for Steck[1].
Recovering the Millions: Easier Said Than Done
Investigations by WDR and Süddeutsche Zeitung revealed that companies linked to Steck have been insolvent since 2023. He only admitted to the Bonn Regional Court in February 2025 that his alleged fortune is presumably gone[1].
Steck: From Humble Beginnings to Lawyer and Cum-Ex Mastermind
Born and raised modestly, Steck is a lawyer who's worked extensively in international banking and capital market law since 2001. His professional history includes prestigious law firms in Frankfurt, New York, and London[4]. He moved to Switzerland in 2010 and has been working there since[4]. Despite his legal troubles, Steck has been talkative, discussing his involvement in the Cum-Ex scandal in a recent ZDF documentary[4].
Brorhilker first questioned Steck in 2017. Since then, his testimony in almost a dozen criminal trials contributed to numerous convictions. His defense emphasizes Steck's reliability[4]. "The reliability of our client's statements has not been questioned by any court; instead, they've been repeatedly confirmed in almost every verdict," said his lawyer Gerhard Strate[4]. Steck's testimony has resulted in 853,413,858.49 euros being returned to the state[4].
Despite these significant contributions, informants don't automatically escape punishment when they testify against other defendants. Steck maintained that he was promised immunity, an assertion Brorhilker denies[4]. Now, the question remains: what benefits did Steck's cooperation with the prosecutor's office provide?
Capital, a partner brand of stern, brings you selected content. For more from Capital, visit www.stern.de/capital
Keywords: Kai-Uwe Steck, Cum-Ex Scandal, Stock Trading, Fraud, Criminal Trial, Hanno Berger
In light of Steck's ongoing criminal trial for his role in the Cum-Ex scandal, there is discussion about the implementation of a community policy related to his vocational training and potential involvement in business activities post-sentence. Financial implications for Steck's business dealings extend beyond the Cum-Ex case, as he is yet to fulfill a significant financial obligation of 39 million euros, raising questions about the whereabouts of his 50 million euro fortune. This unfulfilled debt can potentially be seen as a violation of general-news and crime-and-justice principles.
