Skip to content

UPU's Shipping Structure Puts U.S. Merchants at Disadvantage

The UPU's structure favors Chinese merchants with cheaper shipping rates. U.S. merchants pay more, impacting their global competitiveness.

In this image there is a store, on the top there is some text.
In this image there is a store, on the top there is some text.

UPU's Shipping Structure Puts U.S. Merchants at Disadvantage

A recent query about the Universal Postal Union (UPU) revealed a misunderstanding about 'Group 3' countries, which do not dictate shipping prices between China and the USA. However, the UPU's structure does impact international postage rates, putting U.S. merchants at a competitive disadvantage.

The UPU does not categorize countries into groups for setting shipping prices. Instead, postage rates vary greatly among nations. China, classified as a 'Group 3' country, enjoys cheaper shipping rates to the USA through the ePacket program. This allows Chinese merchants to ship to U.S. consumers at rates unavailable to U.S. merchants.

The cost disparity is evident: it's cheaper to send a package from Beijing to San Francisco than from Los Angeles to San Francisco. This pricing structure puts U.S. ecommerce merchants at a disadvantage, as they cannot ship products to China in a similar inexpensive manner due to China's group 3 classification. The U.S., a 'Group 1' country, pays the most for international shipping.

The UPU's structure, coupled with varying postage rates, creates an uneven playing field for international shipping. While cross-border ecommerce and shipping are booming, U.S. merchants face higher shipping costs, potentially impacting their competitiveness in the global market. The USPS already loses millions annually on international mail, with domestic consumers subsidizing these losses.

Read also:

Latest